help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Building on Windows XP


From: Giuseppe Luigi Punzi
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Building on Windows XP
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:38:54 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)

Hi again Paolo, list..

Paolo Bonzini escribió:
Giuseppe Luigi Punzi wrote:
Ok, now compiled and run, but seems only work from MSYS.

so, launching from MSYS works but not from cmd.exe?  Interesting. :-)

Yes. I executed gst in the MSYS prompt, and goes to a blank line. I did it "2+2 inspect."

If I do it from cmd, a blank line appear, but the prompt appear again. And no response from parameters like -v

I did a make clean, and compiled again. The "make check" works until intmath.st, and then freeze. I cancelled after 4 minutes aprox.

## ------------------------------ ##
## GNU Smalltalk 3.0b test suite. ##
## ------------------------------ ##

Regression tests.

 1: arrays.st                                       ok
 2: classes.st                                      ok
 3: blocks.st                                       ok
 4: sets.st                                         ok
 5: processes.st                                    ok
 6: exceptions.st                                   ok
7: intmath.st make[2]: *** [check-local] Interrupt
make[1]: *** [check-am] Interrupt
make: *** [check-recursive] Interrupt



From MSYS

address@hidden /e/Desarrollo/GST/smalltalk-3.0b
$ gst
2+2 inspect.
An instance of SmallInteger

From CMD

E:\Desarrollo\GST\smalltalk-3.0b>gst.exe -v

E:\Desarrollo\GST\smalltalk-3.0b>


, and as I said, I don't have experience doing this out of a Linux Box and APT :P

Have you tried under MacOS?
Not yet. MacOS is my personal Laptop, and is at home now. I will try it later, but, I searched the web of macports, and gnu-smalltalk is not there (or the web is doing something wrong)

Paolo
Cheers.

Sorry for my bad english, I hope all can understand me (like a Cherokee :D) **




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]