[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎó

From: Joi Ellis
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:48:35 -0500 (CDT)

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, R P Herrold wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Les Bell wrote:
> > Before moderation, how about the simpler step of simply denying all posts
> > by non-members? I can see no legitimate reason why a CVS user would want to
> > post to the list and not receive replies.
> Re-read my proposal --- that _was_ my approach  <grin>
> I have copied RMS (who seems able to get attention <grin>) on 
> poll results:  6 in favor, 0 opposed, 5 new pieces of spam at 
> the moment.
> Will advise.
> -- Russ

I'm in favor, too.  I just joined this list last week, and it's
the noisest list I've ever seen.  I think your proposal is a fine
way to reduce the spam problem.

Joi Ellis                    Software Engineer
Aravox Technologies          address@hidden, address@hidden

No matter what we think of Linux versus FreeBSD, etc., the one thing I
really like about Linux is that it has Microsoft worried.  Anything
that kicks a monopoly in the pants has got to be good for something.
           - Chris Johnson

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]