[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS import
Derek Robert Price
Re: CVS import
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:41:31 -0400
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
McNamee, John wrote:
>On April 15, 2004 at 1:34 PM, Frederic Brehm wrote:
>>At 01:34 PM 4/15/2004, McNamee, John wrote:
>>>I've never understood why cvs add
>>>doesn't have the option to work recursively when most other
>>>cvs commands do. This issue keeps coming up on info-cvs.
>>You can always submit a patch.
>I believe patches have been submitted, or at least offered,
>but were rejected. Basically the idea was shot down.
I have to admit that the recursive add to a branch is a fairly
persuasive argument as far as I'm concerned, but even if you can get
Mark or Larry to agree, I won't have time to review any large patches
for some time. If the change turns out to be small, it might slip
past my guard. It would, of course, need test cases and documentation
in doc/cvs.texinfo. See the HACKING file for more on submitting
patches to CVS.
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- CVS import, Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes, 2004/04/14
- RE: CVS import, McNamee, John, 2004/04/15
- Re: CVS import,
Derek Robert Price <=