[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spam despite spam header
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Spam despite spam header |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:21:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>> I have for some reason been getting spam lately,
>> even though the headers contain information it is
>> spam.
>
> Well, some system running SpamAssassin inserted
> those, not the spammers ;-)
Of course, but it doesn't do much good if the headers
are only inserted and that will be that, does it?
> By splitting, as you would do with any other email
> you do not want in your mail.misc group.
>
>>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>
> Maybe on this header?
You mean like this?
(setq nnmail-split-methods
'(("spam" "^X-Spam-Flag: YES")
("mail.misc" "") ))
I hope I won't get them in a directory called "spam",
now!
I tested sending a mail to myself with "X-Spam-Flag:
YES" as a header, but it was delivered to mail.misc,
and the header had been removed. Perhaps SpamAssassin
thought that wasn't spam, and I got overruled.
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/11
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Adam Sjøgren, 2013/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Dmitrii Kashin, 2013/12/11
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Adam Sjøgren, 2013/12/11
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Dmitrii Kashin, 2013/12/12
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Peter Münster, 2013/12/12
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Dmitrii Kashin, 2013/12/12
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Adam Sjøgren, 2013/12/23
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/24
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/11
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Adam Sjøgren, 2013/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/11