[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spam despite spam header
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Spam despite spam header |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:03:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Dmitrii Kashin <freehck@freehck.ru> writes:
>>> Can't you have it unsubscribed?
>>
>> I don't know. How would I do that, and what would it
>> do?
>
> By pressing 'u' in the group buffer.
Aha, of course. No, I don't think I need to do that
unless I add a "spam" group.
> Gnus prefers to hide articles that doesn't seem to be
> interesting. There's no difference between nntp
> groups and 'mail groups'.
No.
> You can use scoring in both. Score is a number you
> add to the article to show its importance level'. If
> score is high article will be bold. If it's low
> article will be marked as read automatically. If it's
> too low then article will expire (will be hided at
> all).
So can I setup scoring to score mails with the spam
header so low they will never be visible, anywhere? If
so, yes, that would do it.
> You decide. As I've already written: if I've foreseen
> such a pile of correspondence I would not reorganize
> it later.
The news- and/or mailgroups of Gnus are organized
enough. I don't see problem now or in the future.
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: Spam despite spam header, (continued)
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Adam Sjøgren, 2013/12/23
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/24
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/11
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Adam Sjøgren, 2013/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/11
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Dmitrii Kashin, 2013/12/12
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/12
- Re: Spam despite spam header, Adam Sjøgren, 2013/12/13