[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: better solution for html mails?
From: |
Adam Sjøgren |
Subject: |
Re: better solution for html mails? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:14:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel writes:
> asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>> Lars wrote shr (which eww uses) for showing HTML emails. Maybe try
>> that, and see if it suits you better?
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he write eww as well?
Uhm, yes, of course?
> So shouldn't you get the same "both" ways?
Ehh, what?!?
I was trying to explain that a) eww was a biproduct of writing shr,
which b) was made to render HTML, and c) is the default method to show
HTML in Gnus these days.
> In my experience, which is limited to a short test of eww, I admit,
> Emacs-w3m is the best web browser for Emacs, [....]
> So why not try that?
Because w3m is what the original poster _already was using_. Did you
read the articles in this thread at all?!
Best regards,
Adam
--
"You do not know what geometry means, do you?" Adam Sjøgren
"Of course I do, it is a type of camel." asjo@koldfront.dk
Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27
- Re: better solution for html mails?,
Adam Sjøgren <=
- Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Adam Sjøgren, 2015/03/27
- Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Adam Sjøgren, 2015/03/27
- Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27