[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: better solution for html mails?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: better solution for html mails? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2015 18:20:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> writes:
> This seems to work a bit better than w3m-el (fonts
> look nicer).
If you don't like the w3m default faces, like all
other faces, they are up for configuration:
As `M-x describe-face RET w3m- TAB' reveals:
w3m-anchor w3m-arrived-anchor
w3m-bold w3m-current-anchor
w3m-form w3m-form-button
w3m-form-button-mouse w3m-form-button-pressed
w3m-form-inactive w3m-header-line-location-content
w3m-header-line-location-title w3m-history-current-url
w3m-image w3m-image-anchor
w3m-insert w3m-italic
w3m-session-select w3m-session-selected
w3m-strike-through w3m-tab-background
w3m-tab-mouse w3m-tab-selected
w3m-tab-selected-background w3m-tab-selected-retrieving
w3m-tab-unselected w3m-tab-unselected-retrieving
w3m-tab-unselected-unseen w3m-underline
> However, it still does not seem not seem to display
> images at all :-/ --> I guess I'll just have to live
> with this, or can I configure shr to diplay all
> images at the bottom of the mail (which is not that
> hard)?
Why do you want to use HTML e-mails at all?
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Adam Sjøgren, 2015/03/27
- Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Adam Sjøgren, 2015/03/27
- Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Adam Sjøgren, 2015/03/27
- Message not available
- Re: better solution for html mails?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/03/27