[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list
From: |
Adam Sjøgren |
Subject: |
Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2023 19:31:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Sergey writes:
> I wonder why simple 'nil is not accepted as well: it's extremely
> confusing.
nnnil is the "do nothing" backend, the name is similar to eg nnimap,
nnspool, and nnmbox.
The historical split between the primary select method and the secondary
methods is more confusing to me :-)
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Too much, too soon Adam Sjøgren
You're way out of tune asjo@koldfront.dk
No class, no class"
- Removing the first nntp server from the list, Richmond, 2023/01/25
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Adam Sjøgren, 2023/01/25
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Richmond, 2023/01/25
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/26
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/01/26
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/26
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/26
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Richmond, 2023/01/26
- Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/26
Re: Removing the first nntp server from the list, Sergey Organov, 2023/01/25