[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMM
From: |
Farid Hajji |
Subject: |
Re: VMM |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:02:27 +0200 (CEST) |
> If the theory is correct (under which conditions?), then it mightbe feasible
> to have a distributed VM system with an economic market model. There could
> be a price for pages, and the price might change depending on the demand.
Good point! The price represents global state and this is exactly what
a VM system needs to know. Now, you only need to allocate "money" to the
tasks. A Java-VM needing 128 MB of RAM would need to be very rich, while
ls(1) would belong to the poor folks. Which one is worthy to be allowed
to bid for more resources? ;-) Ahemm...
> Of course, thinking this through requires a lot of more work. But it is an
> interesting idea nevertheless, I think.
Yes, that's a very good idea.
-Farid.
--
Farid Hajji -- Unix Systems and Network Admin | Phone: +49-2131-67-555
Broicherdorfstr. 83, D-41564 Kaarst, Germany | address@hidden
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - -
Due to budget cuts, light at end of tunnel will be out. --Unknown.
- Re: Licensing Issues, (continued)
- Re: Licensing Issues, Niels Möller, 2002/10/09
- Re: Licensing Issues, Joshua LeVasseur, 2002/10/10
- Re: Licensing Issues, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/11
- Re: Licensing Issues, Niels Möller, 2002/10/11
- Re: Licensing Issues, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/11
- Re: Licensing Issues, Tom Hart, 2002/10/11
- Re: Licensing Issues, Farid Hajji, 2002/10/11
- VMM, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/11
- Re: VMM, Farid Hajji, 2002/10/13
- Re: VMM, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/10/13
- Re: VMM,
Farid Hajji <=
- Re: VMM, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Niels Möller, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Johannes Rohr, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/13
- Re: VMM, Farid Hajji, 2002/10/13
- Re: VMM, Niels Möller, 2002/10/14
- Re: VMM, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Niels Möller, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Niels Möller, 2002/10/15