[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd-L4 : Architecture Questions
From: |
Patrick Negre |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd-L4 : Architecture Questions |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:48:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
ness, wrote :
> I's because of the system doesn't know about the auth server (well it
> knows about it, because both are a integral part of the system, but this
> would break the design).
What about the design ? I understand in the L4-Hurd thread that the "trust
problem" is such big that a cap-server have to be construct. Sush server that
does'nt break the design too ? The first capabilities protocol did'nt need a
cap server. Now every single capabilitie call have to pass through the cap
server. Does'nt it's better if the server acquire trust on a client with lony
one access to the auth server ? And more, the communications between the
client and the server will be locale to the processor ( if the 2 process are
local indeed ), i think that's better for a SMP architecture ( less cache
synchronisations ).
> >>2.:
> Well, I tried to say that it's no problem for these server to create
> multiple threads. And the kernel (pistachio) will arrange them on the
> multiple processors if available.
I got it, that's fine.
Thanks, Negre Patrick