[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Let's do some coding :-)
From: |
Christopher Nelson |
Subject: |
RE: Let's do some coding :-) |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:57:04 -0600 |
> Hi,
>
> > If Marcus et al. want to work on building a new, forward-oriented
> > operating system `Hurd', that is fine.
>
> Not exactly.
>
> If Marcus et al. want to work on building a new,
> forward-oriented operating system, that is perfectly fine.
> They are free to use their time any way they like.
>
> However, if they are working on something completely
> unrelated to the goals of the Hurd, they should choose a
> different name, and build an own community, instead of
> distracting and discouraging those interested in getting a
> working GNU kernel.
Why doesn't someone ask RMS to peek his nose in here and offer his own
opinion. I hear lots of people interpreting what he wanted, but maybe
he has a different take on things now.
-={C}=-
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), (continued)
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: design goals vs mechanisms (was: Re: Let's do some coding :-), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
RE: Let's do some coding :-), Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25
RE: Let's do some coding :-),
Christopher Nelson <=