Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 05:43 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:13:49 -0400,

> You can run your own meta-constructor, constructor and space bank, and
> have users negotiate on them and use them for their own purpose.

While I am not still chasing the banning issue, this definitely
constitutes a de facto architectural ban. Yes, I can do this, but it
simply isn't very useful.

> If this is sufficient for you, then you have just disproved your claim
> that the system can not be retrofitted to support this.

It is absolutely not sufficient for me.

> > I do not see how to prevent this without disabling IPC altogether. What
> > am I missing here?
> 
> I have never made any attempt to prevent it.  Are you still chasing
> the "banning" stuff?

No. I had simply failed to understand just how completely awful the
proposed design was.

shap