[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linus replies
|
From: |
Tom Bachmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Linus replies |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 22:35:39 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060403) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Jones wrote:
> For my pure education, what is gained going the microkernel way?
>
The system gets more reliable (one component should not be able to crash
the whole system, and a "component" here can be e.g. a driver), the
software becomes easier to maintain (as you can efficiently split it up
in multiple parts), I'm sure there is more. This is just for multiserver
OSes.
I think much of linus' posting is about microkernels and not multiserver
OSes.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEYk6bvD/ijq9JWhsRArT6AJ97Sfmfi8cr8nZV2+pJ054tjLrVuACeICBT
LD+BDb2h6YPYoz0sa9tpdNY=
=h5NS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Computer: Can We Make Operating Systems Reliable and Secure?, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/06
- Re: Computer: Can We Make Operating Systems Reliable and Secure?, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/06
- Linus replies. Re: Computer: Can We Make Operating Systems Reliable and Secure?, Donnie Jones, 2006/05/09
- Re: Linus replies, Tom Bachmann, 2006/05/10
- Re: Linus replies, Marco Gerards, 2006/05/11
- Re: Linus replies, Richard Braun, 2006/05/11
- Re: Linus replies, Martin Schoenbeck, 2006/05/11
- Re: Linus replies, Richard Braun, 2006/05/12
- Re: Linus replies, Michal Suchanek, 2006/05/13
- Re: Linus replies, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/13
- Re: Linus replies, Martin Schoenbeck, 2006/05/11