[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++
|
From: |
Sam Mason |
|
Subject: |
Re: C++ |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:00:31 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:49:48PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> But then that isn't about C++ vs. C, it's about how to most efficiently
> represent your data in memory. And for many access patterns an array is
> simply
> the fastest way.
Yup, but if you're effectively ending up with C code what's the point in
pretending it's C++.
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
- Re: C++, (continued)
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/09/24
- Re: Broken dream of mine :(, arnuld uttre, 2009/09/17
- C++ (was: Broken dream of mine :( ), olafBuddenhagen, 2009/09/23
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/09/23
- Re: C++, Tom Bachmann, 2009/09/23
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/09/23
- Re: C++, Tom Bachmann, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++, Michal Suchanek, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++, Sam Mason, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++,
Sam Mason <=
- Re: C++, Lluis, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/09/25
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/09/24
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/09/25
Re: Broken dream of mine :(, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/09/16