Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches

[Rocky Bernstein]

Sorry for the delay. Things have been busy for me.

It is interesting to hear back after the 5 or so years. About a month and a
half ago we were discussing dropping libcdio's OS/2 driver altogether.  See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libcdio-devel/2014-06/msg00004.html

What motivated this was the desire to change the API to add get_track_isrc
and Robert Kausch mentioned he had no way to test OS/2. In that, we
realized that basically no one *is* actively testing OS/2.

Aside from yourself and possibly Natalia, do you know anyone else that is
using this?

Given the low activity and difficulty for finding developers and testers,
I'm inclined to have this maintained by you and Natalia in separately. She
already has a fork on github of libcdio-paranoia.

If OS/2 is to survive in libcdio, someone needs to commit to handle
problems and API changes as such things arise. Are you willing to commit to
this?

Lastly, on the first patch. It has to do with deciding on whether the use
the libcdio-supplied getopt.c,and this is based purely on OS. OS/2 is the
only one to not used the supplied getopt.c

Rather than have a test by OS, I'd prefer a test to compile the supplied
getopt;  if that fails, then run a test to see if there is an OS getopt.



On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:50 PM, KO Myung-Hun <address@hidden> wrote:

> Ping ?
>
> KO Myung-Hun wrote:
> > Hi/2, long tiem no see. ^^
> >
> > I attach the patches to build libcdio and to enhance memory usage on
> OS/2.
> >
> > Review, please...
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> KO Myung-Hun
>
> Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.7.2
> Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15
> In VirtualBox v4.1.32 on Intel Core i7-3615QM 2.30GHz with 8GB RAM
>
> Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr
>
>
>