[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Matrix communication protocol.
|
From: |
Denver Gingerich |
|
Subject: |
Re: Matrix communication protocol. |
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:34:56 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 07:25:15PM +0200, Msavoritias wrote:
> The second point I was trying to raise is that XMPP doesn't have good
> clients for Mobile,
You mention this repeatedly without explaining why Conversations has "bad
design". Most people I know love the design of Conversations, so I have
trouble seeing why Conversations is holding back XMPP in some way.
> doesn't have modern features
The only feature you have explicitly mentioned is "stickers". I'm not sure why
this is an important feature for FSF to have in a protocol they want to
promote. Are there other "modern features" that XMPP is missing?
> or even a coherent standard.
As we've mentioned, there are coherent standards for XMPP. If you want a
client that supports the important standards, use Gajim or Conversations.
> So by that point I was advocating to have a Matrix server so we can
> attract new contributors that may want modern features.
Per above, please tell us which "modern features" you mean. Thanks!
Denver
https://jmp.chat/