Re: Continued tidying up of ltdl

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Nov 17, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <address@hidden> wrote:

> This patch is a start at correcting the violation of POSIX reserved
> namespace with `_t' suffixes

Ouch!

> At the end of ltdl.h, I define all the old symbols in terms of the new
> ones for backwards comptibility.

Sounds reasonable.

I can't think of any way to get deprecation warnings either.  Except
by renaming the header file and adding a `#warn' line to the old
header.  Ugh!

> Okay to commit?

Yep.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me