Re: LT_AC_PROG_SED patch against 1.4 branch

[Albert Chin]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> Robert> Approved!  Checking in.
> 
> So it won't work with 2.5x.

Good point. Not, it won't. It's easy enough to use $ac_c if defined or
$ECHO_C if defined. Want me to do that instead?

How about replacing:
  echo $ac_n "0123456789$ac_c" >"$tmp/sed.in"
with:
  if test "x$ECHO_C$ECHO_N" != x; then
    echo $ECHO_N "0123456789$ECHO_C" >"$tmp/sed.in"
  else
    echo $ac_n "0123456789$ac_c" >"$tmp/sed.in"
  fi

Or is this too simplistic?

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)