Re: LT_AC_PROG_SED patch against 1.4 branch

[Akim Demaille]

| On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:17:45AM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
| > >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <address@hidden> writes:
| > 
| > Robert> Approved!  Checking in.
| > 
| > So it won't work with 2.5x.
| 
| Good point. Not, it won't. It's easy enough to use $ac_c if defined or
| $ECHO_C if defined. Want me to do that instead?
| 
| How about replacing:
|   echo $ac_n "0123456789$ac_c" >"$tmp/sed.in"
| with:
|   if test "x$ECHO_C$ECHO_N" != x; then
|     echo $ECHO_N "0123456789$ECHO_C" >"$tmp/sed.in"
|   else
|     echo $ac_n "0123456789$ac_c" >"$tmp/sed.in"
|   fi
| 
| Or is this too simplistic?

echo ${ECHO_N-$ac_n} "0123456789${ECHO_C-$ac_c}" >"$tmp/sed.in"

??