Re: PATCH fixups for proper setting of archive_cmds_need_lc

[Albert Chin]

On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 02:46:02PM -0600, Robert Boehne wrote:
> @@ -5376,11 +5375,11 @@
>  if test "$GCC" = yes; then
>    variables_saved_for_relink="$variables_saved_for_relink GCC_EXEC_PREFIX 
> COMPILER_PATH LIBRARY_PATH"
>  fi
> -
> +# Skip the -lc test if a tag was specified.
> +ifelse([$1],[],[
>  #
>  # Do we need to explicitly link libc?
>  #
> -_LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=yes
>  if test "$enable_shared" = yes && test "$GCC" = yes; then
>    case $_LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds, $1) in
>    *'~'*)
> @@ -5421,7 +5420,7 @@
>      AC_MSG_RESULT([$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)])
>      ;;
>    esac
> -fi
> +fi], [])
>  ])# AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS

I disagree with treating the C tag specially. No tag should be treated
any different than another. So, my preference is to see:
  _LT_AC_TAGVAR(archive_cmds_need_lc, $1)=no
in all non-C tags specified explicitly.

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)