[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH fixups for proper setting of archive_cmds_need_lc
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH fixups for proper setting of archive_cmds_need_lc |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:41:45 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 04:32:27PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >I disagree with treating the C tag specially. No tag should be treated
> >any different than another.
>
> If you mean this in general (and not just as it relates to this -lc
> issue), then there's this comment from when I originally folded stuff
> into the AC_LIBTOOL_POSTDEP_PREDEP function
>
> (AC_LIBTOOL_POSTDEP_PREDEP): new function.
> moved the "find hidden library dependencies" code here
> from AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG. Attempted to make it
> multi-tag compatible, but currently only CXX calls it.
Yes, in general. I also know that the C tag is currently treated
differently. However, I'd like to keep the current special treatment
to a minimum.
> I think AC_LIBTOOL_POSTDEP_PREDEP has gotten its shakedown, but there
> are other changes needed in the "C" codepath before C can be treated
> like C++/other tags.
>
> OTOH, that may be too radical a change to contemplate this "close" to a
> release. If we are, in fact, close. <g>
Actually, now would be a good time.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)