Re: [Bug-gnulib] xalloc module dependencies

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
>
> In the general case I would agree with you.  I'm hoping that since the
> differences between the two files tend to be just the gnulib
> integration,
> and that a broadly identical handful of lines constitutes the
> implementation
> of each, that I can contribute the libltdl portability layer to gnulib,
> and
> let the wider gnulib community help maintain it so that I can
> concentrate
> on libtool proper...

Given that the last time the copyright on ltdl.c was updated (until
today) was 2002, does it seem to you that maintaining these small
functions is keeping you from concentrating on the rest of libtool?

Is it possible that a mountain is being made out of a molehill?

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen