libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: molehill ----> mountain


From: Bob Friesenhahn
Subject: Re: molehill ----> mountain
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:38:39 -0600 (CST)

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:

> Now that we don't RTLD_GLOBAL anymore there is no reason for internal
> apis
> to leak into libltdl clients... :-)

You are missing the distinction between libltdl and the modules it
loads.  Global symbols from libltdl will always permeate dependent
applications. :-)

> > In some ways the macroized version looks cleaner.
>
> Okay, I went overboard.  I think HEAD has too much code between
> LT_EREALLOC
> and sbrk.  I think my patch 100 has too little. Lets see if 100bis is
> less
> controversial ;-)

I agree that the original macros were obtuse.  100bis it is.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]