[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:37:40 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Mar 2004, at 17:47, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Libltdl itself is not thread safe.
That's a bug! Do you have any test cases? (I have never programmed
with threads, so it is entirely possible that the mutex code I added
is incredibly naive).
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFAa1ZEFRMICSmD1gYRAkrzAKDGAxiW6MB6YU23bp0n6O+ouOq/bQCfdJZo
/bu3Q2SBJfeKEK0XXPt5hj4=
=1c21
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/03/31