Re: Solaris issues (was: quoting bug in 2.0)

[Mats Rynge]

* Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> [2004-12-01 18:52:02 +0100]:

> * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:29:57PM CET:
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > >On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > >
> > >>OK to apply to HEAD and branch-2-0?
> > >
> > >Before this change is submitted I would like to know how Solaris 10 
> > >(already available in trial form, and soon to be released) will be 
> > >identified and handled.  Since Solaris 10 presumably adds a digit, is 
> > >there other code in libtool which will unnecessarily misbehave under 
> > >Solaris 10?
> > 
> > I probably was not clear.  It seems that this particular code is 
> > likely to work for Solaris 10, but are there other libtool areas which 
> > will not?
[...]
> I'm Cc'ing the people that reported the bugs back then.  Maybe someone
> can add something useful (given they're still interested).

I will not have access to a Solaris 10 machine for a while, and until
someone does, I do not see why Solaris 8 and 9 should not be fixed.

-- 
Mats Rynge
USC/Information Sciences Institute  -  Center for Grid Technologies