Re: libtoolize

[Patrick Welche]

[now on libtool-patches]

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 11:10:24AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Patrick Welche wrote:
> 
> >As to where the point the finger, I would say "libtoolize" as it doesn't
> >seem to be copying the .m4's from libtool-2.1a/m4, assuming that is what
> >it is still meant to do..
> 
> I am pretty sure that Gary backed out support for the libtool 
> version-specific m4 directory.  That would mean that your 
> libtool-2.1a/m4 directory is now an orphan and should be manually 
> removed.  It is quite possible that inconsistencies remain (as you 
> pointed out earlier).

This was 10 Dec's CVS code. The m4 files were copied to libtool-2.1a/m4
(you can actually watch this in the "make install" output) Updating
now to see if it makes a difference...

Cheers,

Patrick

> I recommend discussing issues with unreleased libtool versions on the 
> libtool-patches list since otherwise the discussions are confusing for 
> those using a released libtool.