Re: put slist in ltdl namespace

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Bob,

* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 07:23:30PM CET:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> 
> >This is just a gentle reminder for Gary that, when he comes back,
> >he needs to look at this and decide whether it's ok like this.
> >
> >(Probably either the prefix should be lt_, or strl* should have prefix
> >lt__ as well, but I haven't grokked Gary's idea of what the namespaces
> >ought to be.)
> 
> I should have expressed concern earlier. 

Why?  No released libltdl has that problem.

> Any non-public symbol from 
> libltdl should be lt__ scoped.  This should include any replacement 
> code for glibc functions.  Without the scoping, libltdl may conflict 
> with other libraries which also provide glibc replacement functions.

I cannot see any code except for slist which has the problem.

Are you talking about "no prefix" vs. "prefix" or "lt_ prefix" vs. "lt__
prefix"?

My question was merely regarding the latter (and maybe the location of
the replacement #defines).

Regards,
Ralf