|
| From: | Bob Friesenhahn |
| Subject: | Re: also copy install-sh |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:00:48 -0600 (CST) |
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Might be an option. At least for branch-1-5, however, I'd rather just back out my patch and go back to what people know. The less surprises, the better. We could also just mention that AC_PROG_LIBTOOL resp. LT_INIT uses AC_PROG_INSTALL, and thus its requirements (which are documented in Autoconf docs) have to be met, i.e., there has to be a file `install.sh' or `install-sh'. How about that (just a doc update) instead?
Sounds good to me. Maybe libtoolize should warn if install-sh is not yet present (assuming it knows where it should be).
Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn address@hidden http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |