libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [patch 10/19] 294-gary-libltdl-configure-messages.diff Queue


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [patch 10/19] 294-gary-libltdl-configure-messages.diff Queue
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:25:54 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:26:34PM CEST:
> Don't do this anymore:
> 
> checking for ltdl.h... yes
> checking for lt_dlinterface_register in -lltdl... checking for 
> lt_dlinterface_register in ltdl.h... no
> no
> checking whether to use included libltdl... yes
> 
>  libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: libtool--devo--1.0/ChangeLog
> from  Gary V. Vaughan  <address@hidden>
>       * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (LT_WITH_LTDL): Don't nest AC_MSG_CHECKING/
>       AC_MSG_RESULT pairs.

OK right away.

Thank you!
Ralf

> Index: libtool--devo--1.0/libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4
> ===================================================================
> --- libtool--devo--1.0.orig/libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4
> +++ libtool--devo--1.0/libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4
> @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ AC_ARG_WITH([included_ltdl],
>  if test "x$with_included_ltdl" != xyes; then
>    # We are not being forced to use the included libltdl sources, so
>    # decide whether there is a useful installed version we can use.
> -  AC_MSG_CHECKING([for lt_dlinterface_register in ltdl.h])
>    lt_dlinterface_register_found=no
>    AC_CHECK_HEADER([ltdl.h],
>        [AC_CHECK_LIB([ltdl], [lt_dlinterface_register],
> @@ -181,6 +180,7 @@ if test "x$with_included_ltdl" != xyes; 
>        [],
>        [AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT]
>    )
> +  AC_MSG_CHECKING([for lt_dlinterface_register in ltdl.h])
>    test "x$with_included_ltdl" = xno && lt_dlinterface_register_found=yes
>    AC_MSG_RESULT([$lt_dlinterface_register_found])
>  fi




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]