Re: [patch 1/2] 307-gary-fix-recursive-ltdl-dist-rules.diff

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:39:27PM CET:
>
> > Argh! I seem to have posted an in development version of this patch
> > somehow, sorry.  Here is the real patch.  If you had weird non-repeatable
> > results in tests, and corrupted libltdl/Makefile.am before, this version
> > doesn't have that problem.
>
>
> Good.  
>
>
> > Okay to commit this version?
>
>
> No.  With this, in any of the three subproject/(non)recursive modes,
> one of Makefile.{am,inc} will end up with a newer time stamp (and
> Makefile.in won't match Makefile.am's contents).

Oops.  Yes, nice catch.  I'm fast running out of brown paper bags...

Okay, I need to completely rethink how to do this.  Unfortunately,
I'm flat out with other work until 3rd week of December now, so I
may not get to it until then :-(

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature