[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Results of test runs
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: Results of test runs |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:01:42 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Leif Ekblad wrote:
|>This test has $host and $build i686-pc-linux-gnu, but we would like to
|>see how it fares on RDOS. So if RDOS is a cross-target, you would use
|>something similar to
|> configure --host=i686-rdos-whatever
|>(adjust to the appropriate value/your toolchain prefix) and possibly
|>specify some of them also manually (CC, LD, AR, ..)
|
|
| It says "checking host system type... Invalid configuration 'rdos' : machine
| not
| recognized"
|
|
|>and if you can build natively on RDOS, just do that, it's bound to be
|>simpler.
|
|
| No, that is not possible. It might be some day, but not right now.
|
|
|>I'm not sure what your goal is; your recent question indicates that you
|>need the libtool changes in order to be able to create a GCC that
|>targets RDOS. Is that correct?
|
|
| Yes. GCC uses the libtool.m4 file, and I need RDOS to be
| defined there.
|
|
|>Have you managed to either get them
|>to apply your libtool-related changes, and/or have you maybe managed
|>to just apply the yourself to a local GCC source tree and build from
|>that, including regeneration of the generated files.
|
|
| I've added them manually to GCCs libtool.m4, and then the build
| process of GCC + libstdc++-v3 works just fine. I'm trying to get
| the patches accepted for GCC.
|
|
|>(Note I don't
|>know exactly how that works within the GCC source tree, but I guess
|>they have some documentation that explains how to do this?)
|
|
| A guy refered me to the libtool project, so I assumed it was done in
| a similiar way as config.sub and config.guess, some files being imported
| to GCC, but it doesn't seem like this is how it works. It turns out there
| are significant differences between the GCC and libtool version of
| libtool.m4.
As far as I'm aware, changes made to gcc's libtool files should generally be
made in libtool cvs first. Submitting your patch to gcc-patches and noting
that the same changes were made to libtool-cvs should get the patch approved.
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQ80G1riDAg3OZTLPAQJn6AP/QfHTzVdxoquTkNs9r3XyIHN7aG9dojZn
OPNagQNJmu792i15c7CbKibNFJV7sbeMjYqZBVP952x1swSYehMq1KBzYDPP1XKd
hmM0Mc5eel+ZBWkgM6vMzhtJNW42O64HQhyeH2LhLnBbY3I2FTF7NzR9lLlAfr86
0Rqq5FDKQ+s=
=IvWH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, (continued)
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/13
- Results of test runs, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs,
Peter O'Gorman <=