Re: lt_dlerror changes

[Charles Wilson]

On 6/18/2010 10:50 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> although oddly, loadlibrary sets CANNOT_OPEN instead of FILE_NOT_FOUND
> (loadlibary.c:vmopen):
> 
> 232         if (!module)
> 233         LOADLIB_SETERROR (CANNOT_OPEN);
> 234       else if (cur)
> 235         {
> 236           LT__SETERROR (CANNOT_OPEN);
> 237           module = 0;
> 238         }
> 
> I think there should be an earlier check for !module @ 206, and THAT one
> should set FILE_NOT_FOUND.  However, this isn't the cause of the current
> problem.

Never mind this bit. We already know the file "exists", because access()
called in find_handle_callback() told us that.  CANNOT_OPEN is the
correct value here.

--
Chuck