[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lt_dlerror changes
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: lt_dlerror changes |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:52:10 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Charles Wilson wrote:
If so, this raises security implications
that we want to avoid.
I don't think so.
Hopefully not. If a binary from an executable program is placed at
the path "C:\cygwin\bin\last" (with no .exe extension) does
LoadLibrary() load it?
Since we are on the subject, it is good to make sure that Windows
really is in good shape security-wise.
Windows paranoia about downloaded files might go away if the file
extension is missing so it is good to know if it will still attempt to
load an exectuable or DLL which has its file extension missing.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, (continued)
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/17
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Peter Rosin, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Charles Wilson, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Charles Wilson, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Charles Wilson, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Charles Wilson, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Charles Wilson, 2010/06/18
- Re: lt_dlerror changes, Charles Wilson, 2010/06/18
Re: lt_dlerror changes, Charles Wilson, 2010/06/24