[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:48:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) |
* Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:23:31PM CEST:
> Original:
> real 25m3.886s
> user 6m24.620s
> sys 11m13.787s
>
> With the functions moved ahead of func_mode_compile:
> real 24m34.235s
> user 6m30.590s
> sys 11m23.878s
>
> So, when compiling about 325 source code files, the new function order
> cost 5 seconds of user time and 10 seconds of system time, total. That's
> 1/20th of a second slower per file, under:
> cygwin-1.7.6-1
> bash-3.2.51-24
> On a 1.67GHz Core 2 Duo machine running Vista.
Yes, but there is a significant speedup in real time!? That makes
little sense, unless the system was busy doing other things also,
for the first run.
5% sucks a bit, fixing that should be a TODO item.
Thanks for doing the measurements,
Ralf
Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6), Roumen Petrov, 2010/08/26
- Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6), Charles Wilson, 2010/08/26
- Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6), Peter Rosin, 2010/08/27
- Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6), Peter Rosin, 2010/08/27
- Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6), Roumen Petrov, 2010/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6), Peter Rosin, 2010/08/31
Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw]: Add cross-compile support to cwrapper (take 6), Charles Wilson, 2010/08/27