libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/7] Add file name conversion from $build to toolchain.


From: Peter Rosin
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Add file name conversion from $build to toolchain.
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:42:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2

Hi Chuck, Ralf,

Den 2010-09-05 22:49 skrev Charles Wilson:
> [meta-request: in the future, could you not use whatever option it is
> that causes the entire patch message to be stored at attachment to the
> actual message...this is a little awkward to reply-to:]
> 
> On 9/5/2010 3:58 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> <nothing>
> 
> ...which means all replies have to manually cut-n-paste-as-quotation
> which is painful.  Unless somebody knows what option to set in TBird to
> DTRT?

If *I* inline the patches, TBird messes up tabs -> four spaces, haven't found
a way to avoid that... I *could* use mutt for sending patches I suppose, but
isn't the attachment marked to be inline? I think they were when I tested
my current patch sending technique...

*looks*

No, "Content-Disposition: attachment;"

address@hidden&#%&


> On 9/5/2010 3:58 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> address@hidden to_tool_file_cmd
> 
> Urk.  I guess I ought to go ahead and define to_host_file_cmd...
> 
> You might also want to add a line or two to the new section concerning
> the "lying" cygwin->mingw case:
> 
>> ...To force the
>> correct file name conversion in this situation, you should do the
>> following _before_ running configure:
>>
>>      export lt_cv_to_host_file_cmd=func_convert_file_cygwin_to_w32
> 
> ...Unless you plan to do all of that as part of some other pure-doc patch.


I have a patch ready with some updates to both the fake and the lying case
(and the nits requested by Ralf), will see if I can find a way to post
without destroying tabs and without causing you all trouble...

Also, no comments for 2/7 and 3/7, does that mean that those are ok?

Cheers,
Peter



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]