[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:58:15 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:34:23PM CEST:
> * configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Prefer better file format.
> Any objections to this patch? xz is a more robust successor to lzma.
I'm fine with, if you also adjust HACKING, .gitignore, Makefile.maint.
We require new-enough Automake for the toplevel anyway now. Please give
Gary a couple of days to object, in case his release setup has other
requirements.
Thanks,
Ralf
- [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Eric Blake, 2010/09/13
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Charles Wilson, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/09/14