[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:40:59 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Charles Wilson wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 07:14:06PM CEST:
> If you want to start an xz-vs-lzip fight, propose the appropriate
> support for dist-lzip on automake-patches and fight it there. :-)
git Automake has dist-lzip support.
lzma/xz support was added at the time it was because somebody (other
than the package author) did a review of the code and found it clean.
Cheers,
Ralf
- [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Eric Blake, 2010/09/13
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Charles Wilson, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/09/14
- Re: [PATCH] maint: ship .xz, not .lzma, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/09/14