[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/4] maint: rearrange Makefile.am in preparation for a follow
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/4] maint: rearrange Makefile.am in preparation for a follow-up patch. |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:26:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:05:49PM CEST:
> * Makefile.am (Libtool scripts.): Move this section below the
> `Bootstrap.' section...
> (libtoolize.in): ...except this one which is generated at
> bootstrap time, and was added into the `Bootstrap.' section.
> (Libltdl.): Move this section below the `Libtool scripts.'
> section.
This move-only patch is fine with me. I am kind of wondering whether we
should wait a little bit for other deal-breaking regressions
necessitating an updated release, but then again, in that case we can
(and should!) start a maint branch off of v2.4-2-g67bbe04 and do a 2.4b
from there.
Thanks,
Ralf
- [PATCH 1/r47] maint: help2man targets should rely on the binaries they call., Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/09/22
- [PATCH 2/4] maint: rearrange Makefile.am in preparation for a follow-up patch., Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/09/22
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] maint: rearrange Makefile.am in preparation for a follow-up patch.,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- [PATCH 3/4] maint: don't leak developer GREP, SED etc into distribution file., Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/09/22
- [PATCH 4/4] maint: simplify and improve safety of bootstrap process., Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/09/22
- Re: [PATCH 1/r47] maint: help2man targets should rely on the binaries they call., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/09/22