Re: libtool-next patch queue

[Gary V. Vaughan]

On 15 Oct 2010, at 10:58, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,

Hallo Ralf,

> I promised I would look at your patch queue for rewriting bootstrap.

Much appreciated, thanks for making the time to do this.

While I don't have too much discretionary hacking time this month, I
will try to address any patch rewrites you need to continue the merge
in a reasonably timely fashion.

FTR, the bootstrap rewrite is directed at gnulib, although when they
have accepted it into their tree, I plan on using it for libtool too as
part of the move to using gnulib more fully - which is what libtool-next
is currently aiming towards.  My private branch (which is about 10
patches ahead of the published branch) is stuck on using git-version-gen,
since the CVS style version number is deeply entwined in the version
mismatch code in ltversion.m4 and ltmain.sh.

I'm also planning to use gnulib-tool to fetch argz from gnulib and
maybe other easy portability modules that don't take time away from
my long-term rewrite of libltdl - but I haven't yet begun to make
patches for any of that yet.

Cheers,
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan (address@hidden)

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part