[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: AC_PATH_X]
From: |
Robert Boehne |
Subject: |
Re: [Fwd: AC_PATH_X] |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:57:15 -0500 |
Ted:
Often when a question is clearly answered in documentation
you won't get any reply on the mailing list.
Sorry,
Robert
Ted Irons wrote:
>
> I sent this to the autoconf and automake mailing lists,
> but received no reply. If anyone on this mailing list
> has an idea of what I am doing wrong, I would
> appreciate hearing about it.
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> - Ted
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: AC_PATH_X
> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:39:10 -0700
> From: Ted Irons <address@hidden>
> Organization: Science Applications
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden
>
> On a Linux-2.4 machine using the following
> AC_PATH_X
> AC_LANG_PUSH(C)
> AC_CHECK_LIB(Xmu, XmuLookupStandardColormap,,, -lXt -lX11)
> AC_CHECK_LIB(X11, XCreateWindow)
> AC_LANG_POP(C)
>
> I get
>
> checking for X... libraries /usr/X11/lib, headers
> checking for XmuLookupStandardColormap in -lXmu... no
> checking for XCreateWindow in -lX11... no
>
> Shouldn't I get "... yes" for the last 2 items?
>
> Note: On some architectures (eg Linux-2.4) AC_PATH_X
> is sufficient for picking up -lX11, etc. On others (eg
> IRIX64-6.5) the AC_CHECK_LIB calls are necessary
> to pick up -lX11, etc. I find this behaviour strange;
> any ideas as to what is going on?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> - Ted
--
Robert Boehne Software Engineer
Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center
TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238
FAX: (630)789-0127
email: address@hidden