[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool for C++
From: |
Steve M. Robbins |
Subject: |
Re: libtool for C++ |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Feb 2002 10:50:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:48:04PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> > It is NOT up-to-date for CVS HEAD and alpha versions of Libtool.
>
> I recall that this documentation was updated in the muti-lingual
> branch. Perhaps it was not merged over as it should have been?
Okay, I checked out 'multi-language-branch', and diff'ed the file
doc/libtool.texi. There are lots of differences!
At the section in question, however, there is simply the addition
of the following note.
@emph{NOTE}: The problems described in this section may no longer
relevant due to the @samp{libtool} multi-language support. To
enable C++ support in libtool, use the @code{AC_LIBTOOL_CXX} macro
in your @file{configure.in} file.
Since the note is written in the conditional voice, I don't really
know what to make of it. Are the problems relevant or not?
Am I okay as long as the library has no static variables? If so, is
that true of the released libtool?
Regards,
-Steve
P.S. Perhaps the note needs revision: elsewhere in the docs, I see
that you don't really need AC_LIBTOOL_CXX, as long as AC_PROG_CXX is
used.
--
by Rocket to the Moon,
by Airplane to the Rocket,
by Taxi to the Airport,
by Frontdoor to the Taxi,
by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ...
- They Might Be Giants
- Re: libtool for C++,
Steve M. Robbins <=