[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Fwd:]

From: Michael Matz
Subject: RE: [Fwd:]
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:04:39 +0100 (MET)


On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Robert Collins wrote:

> > current g++ version (not to speak of proprietary compilers)
> > which need that explicit linking.  Instead a simple "g++
> > -shared -o works". Well, yes, those only having a
> > static libstdc++ are screwed, but so what?
> Well that's quite a few of us (cygwin, mingw)!

Hmm, yes.  But I'm not even sure, you're screwed at all.  Does g++ -shared
the right thing for you?  I guess not, as g++ anyway can't produce DLL's
on it's own, or?  Doesn't it anyway need a special tool?  I.e. does
libtool without the pre-/postdeps work on cygwin, or not?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]