[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Porting libtool to linux-icc (help)
From: |
Bill Wendling |
Subject: |
Re: Porting libtool to linux-icc (help) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jun 2002 02:23:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Also sprach Allan Sandfeld Jensen:
} Hi.
}
} I've already submited a patch for subject, but recieved no feedback. After
} searching the archive I found a mail that explains that you need to be
} registered at FSF before you wish to accept any patches. As I am not
} registered at FSF and have no plans to become so, I want to try a different
} approach.
}
} I hope some of you will create a patch for Intel C++ Compiler support. I can
} help by describing what needs to be done:
} The compilers are called icc for the C-compiler and icpc for the
C++-compiler.
} Both compilers takes the same options as the GNU compilers. The two compilers
} also uses the GNU ld. So you only need to copy the flags given to gcc and
} g++.
} There is two important differences from gcc though:
} 1. For the archivecmds remove the option -nostdlibs.
} 2. For both compilers you need to set to set "archive_cmds_need_lc" to no.
} (if you link with -lc, the linking either breaks or the applications crashes
} when launched)
}
} I hope I get some feedback this time.
}
Hi `Allan,
I was going to apply your patches, but it was for a version of libtool
which we didn't have (I think we're running the latest stable version).
That's why I didn't offer any feedback. I'm not a member of the libtool
FSF collective, but I'll try your suggestions above on our libtool
versions and give feedback, if you think that would help things :).
--
|| Bill Wendling address@hidden
|| Coding Simian