[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a]
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a] |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:05:16 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>
> > Bruce> ... 20 year old shells are [not] too old for continued
> > Bruce> support. Ick. How completely disgusting.
> >
> > Cheer up and read the Autoconf 2.54c announcement entirely :)
>
> You're right. I only read the first 100 lines or so. :-)
> This is a decade overdue. ;-) But still, at the usual
> release rate, libtool's use is still over the horizon. :-(
Not quite. CVS libtool's Cygwin support uses a shell function
now. :-)
Libtool 1.5 is not far off ...
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included .a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included .a], Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a],
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Robert Boehne, 2002/11/07
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Akim Demaille, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], akim, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Bruce Korb, 2002/11/14
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Akim Demaille, 2002/11/15
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Tom Lord, 2002/11/15
- Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Max Bowsher, 2002/11/15
Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a], Charles Wilson, 2002/11/14
Re: [shell functions], Christopher Currie, 2002/11/15