Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts in included.a]

[Robert Boehne]

All,

Hey, that's a relief, now we don't have to deal with this
issue anymore.  I would be in favor of a) leaving the
shell functions in place, and b) making use of them more.
 
Thanks,

Robert

Bruce Korb wrote:
> 
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> 
> >  Bruce> ... 20 year old shells are [not] too old for continued
> >  Bruce> support.  Ick.  How completely disgusting.
> >
> > Cheer up and read the Autoconf 2.54c announcement entirely :)
> 
> You're right.  I only read the first 100 lines or so.  :-)
> This is a decade overdue.  ;-)  But still, at the usual
> release rate, libtool's use is still over the horizon.  :-(
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool-patches mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches