[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
handling of missing AR
From: |
Brian Gough |
Subject: |
handling of missing AR |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:11:54 +0100 |
Hello,
(Ralf, thanks for your previous email.)
I've had a libtool-related problem reported with a test release of GNU
GSL on a Solaris system with gcc & Sun ld, but missing 'ar'.
I am using libtool-1.5.22 autoconf-2.59 automake-1.9.6 for GSL.
The configure stage on this system gives (coming from AC_PROG_LIBTOOL),
checking for ar... false
checking for ranlib... :
checking for strip... :
And the build then fails later (as expected) on the first use of 'ar'
with
....
false cru .libs/libutils.a .libs/placeholder.o
make[2]: *** [libutils.la] Error 1
The question was asked "Why doesn't configure stop with an error when
it finds ar is missing?" I didn't have a good answer to that. For
the average user the final error message is a hard to decipher.
Is there any reason I shouldn't put a test in the configure script to
bail out if ar is not found?---since I'm building static and shared
libraries it is always going to be needed I think.
Thanks for any insights,
--
Brian Gough
(GSL Maintainer)
http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/
- handling of missing AR,
Brian Gough <=
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Tim Mooney, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Tim Mooney, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/30
- Re: handling of missing AR, Tim Mooney, 2006/03/30
- Re: handling of missing AR, David Lee, 2006/03/30
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/30
Re: handling of missing AR, Brian Gough, 2006/03/30
Re: handling of missing AR, Olly Betts, 2006/03/30