[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Still missing some ancient clefs
From: |
Juergen Reuter |
Subject: |
Re: Still missing some ancient clefs |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:09:14 +0200 (CEST) |
On 27 Aug 2002, Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> When I build input/test/ancient-font.ly, I'm still missing some
> clefs. I've done all the font cleaning I know how to do, and there
> aren't any funny symbols instead of the C clefs I'm looking for, but
> there aren't very many clefs, either.
>
ancient-font.ly is not quite up to date, though I would have expected
different things to be broken; I will have a look at it today or
tomorrow evening.
Some fixes that I originally wanted to be put into the 1.6 series
unfortunately did not make it any more into 1.6.0; most notibly a clean
solution to the font-family problem is still missing (which your problem
may be related to). I think on the list we finally agreed that, to get
rid of font-family, we need some kind of virtual font with more than
256 characters.
Greetings,
Juergen
- Still missing some ancient clefs, Laura Conrad, 2002/08/27
- Re: Still missing some ancient clefs,
Juergen Reuter <=
- Re: Still missing some ancient clefs, Laura Conrad, 2002/08/28
- Re: Still missing some ancient clefs, Juergen Reuter, 2002/08/28
- Re: Still missing some ancient clefs, Juergen Reuter, 2002/08/28
- Re: Still missing some ancient clefs, Laura Conrad, 2002/08/28
- [Patch] Bugfix (Was: Re: Still missing some ancient clefs), Juergen Reuter, 2002/08/28
- [Patch] Bugfix (Was: Re: Still missing some ancient clefs), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/28
- Re: [Patch] Bugfix (Was: Re: Still missing some ancient clefs), Juergen Reuter, 2002/08/29
- Re: [Patch] Bugfix (Was: Re: Still missing some ancient clefs), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/29
- Re: [Patch] Bugfix (Was: Re: Still missing some ancient clefs), Juergen Reuter, 2002/08/29
- Re: [Patch] Bugfix (Was: Re: Still missing some ancient clefs), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/29