[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reading material?
From: |
Heikki Johannes Junes |
Subject: |
Re: reading material? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:16:07 +0200 (EET) |
User-agent: |
HUT webmail, IMP 2.2.6 |
> http://www.mindview.net/WebLog/log-0025
I liked especially the following rule:
"If it is not tested, it is broken." =)
>
> > Scheme is interpreted, the behavior of the program (say LilyPond) can be
>
> > changed dynamically.
>
> Just to bring a correction:
> interpreted/compiled implementation is orthogonal dynamic/static
> programs. That's the second that you are refering to, it seems. guile
> scheme is interpreted only, but it could have had a compiler and not
> lose its dynamicity.
I should not have touched the dynamic/static issue -- never have understood it
(i.e. the difference between dynamic/static C-libraries in linux) in depth.
Being said dynamically, I should have said 'when typing a .ly file'. But your
correction (Thanks!) made my point, 'to be able to change the grammary (i.e.
lexical rules) on-the-fly', clearer:
> With other implementations, you can compile files or functions on purpose,
> during run-time.
--
Heikki Junes
- Re: reading material?, (continued)
Re: reading material?, Heikki Johannes Junes, 2004/03/23
Re: reading material?,
Heikki Johannes Junes <=