[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:49:46 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> (read-hash-extend #\{ read-lily-expression)
This is one supercool hack! I didn't know that this was possible.
I wonder whether this the best way to do it (it certainly is quick,
though). If #{ is handled as a combination of # (swallow characters
until GUILE has had enough) and \include (read input from a new
string). Then no tricks with scoping are necessary to make it work,
the init files are only read once, and default durations are done
correctly too.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/04/17
Re: chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/21