[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:52:37 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> -------------------- foo.ly --------------------
> #(use-modules (scm toto))
> #(define toto #{ <<{e' f'} \\ {c' d'} >> #})
> \score { \new Staff { \toto } }
> -------------------- foo.ly --------------------
>
> ie being able to write a music expression, using LilyPond syntax,
> right into a scheme form. This works one time only, as the module
> name will change for each new parsed file.
You can get the module itself with (current-module) -
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
Re: chose module name instead of *anonymous-ly-NN*?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/04/21